Resolution of franchise contracts

The inclusion of compromise clauses opting, therefore, by arbitration in franchise contracts, an alternative has been shown More attractive to the parties, considering the various advantages of arbitration in the resolution of conflicts related to the franchising system.

First, arbitration provides autonomy in the choice of referees, who can be specialized in the franchising area, thus ensuring an in -depth discussion of the specific aspects of this type of business and decisions better founded and appropriate to the context of the context Business.

In addition, arbitration tends to be faster than the traditional judicial system, since procedures are more agile and with well -defined deadlines. This is especially relevant in the context of the franchise, where agility in conflict resolution tends to be crucial for business continuity.

Still, unlike court proceedings, which are usually public, arbitration occurs confidentially, protecting the privacy of the parties and preventing sensitive information from becoming public knowledge.

Thus, the choice of arbitration as a form of conflict resolution in franchise contracts is an intelligent strategy, offering efficiency, flexibility, confidentiality and expertise in resolving any conflicts. In this scenario, arbitration presents itself as a valuable tool to promote a favorable environment for franchise growth and development.